AI coding assistants · Comparison
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot vs JetBrains AI
3 products compared side by side: what you pay for with each one first, then the five access facts, entry prices, recorded plan limits and the bottom line of each review. The evidence note under the table says how each product was checked.
Side by side
| Metric | Cursor | GitHub Copilot | JetBrains AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| What you're paying for | Saves engineering timeAn editor built around coding agents, with zero data retention with model providers and privacy mode enforced for the team on Teams. | Compliance includedUnlimited completions plus chat and agents on models from several providers, with no training on your code and IP indemnity from $19 a user. | Worth the priceAI completion, chat and agents inside JetBrains IDEs, with usage at API rates and no surcharge, and free governance for organizations. |
| Overall score | 6.4 | 8.3Best | 5.3 |
| Free option | Free plan | Free plan | Free plan |
| Card to start | –Not measured | –Not measured | Card required |
| Getting access | Self-serve | Self-serve | Self-serve |
| Starter priceCheapest paid plan | $8/mo | $10/mo | $10/mo |
| Pricing model | Seat + usage | Seat + usage | Seat + usage |
| Pricing page | Public prices | Public prices | Public prices |
| Billing unit | Per seat per month; third-party models from prepaid credit at API list price | Per user per month; chat and agent usage in AI credits ($0.01 each) | AI credits ($1 of use each); individual plans per month; governance per seat |
| Free option | Free plan with limited Agent and Chat on Cursor models; Tab on Free not stated | Copilot Free: 2,000 completions a month, limited chat and agent usage | AI Free with a JetBrains IDE licence; 30-day AI Pro trial, card needed |
| Reference scenario (5 developers) | $150/mo on Teams Premium seats ($30 × 5, monthly), computed | $95/mo on Business ($19 × 5, billed monthly), computed | Not priced: no organization plan includes usage (credits bought separately) |
| Included usage (organization plan) | Premium weekly pool per seat (4x Plus); no absolute size stated | 1,900 AI credits ($19) per user a month, pooled; completions unlimited | None; pooled prepaid credits, 20 per seat with All Products Pack |
| Usage beyond the plan | Prepaid credit at per-token rates, plus $0.25 per million tokens on Teams | Per-token rates in AI credits; on by default for organizations, budgets available | Prepaid credits at API rates, no surcharge; per-user limits |
| Models | Cursor (Grok, Composer), Anthropic, OpenAI and Google models | Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, xAI, Microsoft and Moonshot models on Business | Anthropic, OpenAI and Google models; JetBrains Mellum for completion |
| Training on your code | Not without explicit agreement (terms); Privacy Mode enforced on Teams | Not on Business and Enterprise; Free to Max train unless you opt out | Not without your agreement (terms), on every tier |
| Data retention | Zero data retention with providers in Privacy Mode, with exceptions | IDE prompts not retained; other surfaces 28 days (Business) | Not persisted unless detailed data collection is on; provider retention not stated |
| IP indemnity | In the MSA; plans covered not stated | Business and Enterprise, unmodified suggestions with the filter on | Not offered |
| SSO / SCIM / audit log | SAML SSO on Teams; SCIM and audit log on Enterprise | SAML SSO and audit log listed for Business; SCIM through managed users in an enterprise account | SSO listed on Basic; SAML in IDE Services; SCIM coming soon; console audit page |
| SOC 2 / ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 and ISO 42001 | SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 cover Copilot Business and Enterprise | SOC 2 Type II covers JetBrains AI; ISO 27001 not listed |
| Editors and surfaces | Cursor app, CLI, web, iOS; JetBrains and Xcode integrations on paid plans | VS Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains, Xcode, Eclipse, Neovim, Zed, CLI, github.com | JetBrains IDEs, Android Studio, JetBrains Air app and web |
| Bottom line | From its public pages, Cursor gives a team an agent-first editor with privacy mode enforced and SSO for $30 a seat. Included usage is stated only as multiples, several pages disagree, and SCIM and the audit log need Enterprise. | From its public pages, Copilot Business puts unlimited completions, $19 of pooled usage per user, a wide model choice and the main enterprise controls on a $19 seat. Set budgets early: extra usage is on by default for organizations. | From its public pages, JetBrains AI suits teams in JetBrains IDEs that want unlimited completion and usage at API rates with per-user limits. There is no IP indemnity, no seat with usage included, and several governance features are still coming. |
Evidence: Cursor: facts checked 2026-10-16 from its public sign-up and pricing pages, no completed hands-on run; GitHub Copilot: facts checked 2026-10-16 from its public sign-up and pricing pages, no completed hands-on run; JetBrains AI: facts checked 2026-10-16 from its public sign-up and pricing pages, no completed hands-on run. Prices in USD as listed, excluding tax. "–" means not recorded.
When to pick each
In the words of each review, with the date its facts were checked.
From our Cursor review
Checked Oct 16, 2026- Pick Cursor when
- You want an editor built around agents, with privacy mode enforced for the team and zero data retention with model providers.
- Pick GitHub Copilot when
- You want unlimited completions, usage priced in dollars, and SCIM and an audit log at $19 a seat.
From our GitHub Copilot review
Checked Oct 16, 2026- Pick GitHub Copilot when
- You want unlimited completions, usage priced in dollars, and SCIM and an audit log at $19 a seat.
- Pick Cursor when
- You want an editor built around agents, with privacy mode enforced for the team and zero data retention with model providers.
From our GitHub Copilot review
Checked Oct 16, 2026- Pick GitHub Copilot when
- Your team uses several editors and wants an organization seat with usage included.
- Pick JetBrains AI when
- Your team works in JetBrains IDEs and wants prepaid credits at API rates with no surcharge.
From our JetBrains AI review
Checked Oct 16, 2026- Pick JetBrains AI when
- Your team works in JetBrains IDEs and wants usage at API rates with per-user limits and no seat fee on Basic.
- Pick GitHub Copilot when
- You want an organization seat with usage included, IP indemnity and support for many editors.
From our JetBrains AI review
Checked Oct 16, 2026- Pick JetBrains AI when
- You want to stay in JetBrains IDEs with unlimited completion and your own keys.
- Pick Cursor when
- You want an AI-first editor with privacy mode enforced for the team and a weekly usage pool per seat.
Entry price
Baseline: each product's cheapest paid plan, per month. Included usage differs, so read the line under each price.
- CursorLowest pricePlus$8/mo$80 a year billed annually; individuals only
- Base weekly pool for Cursor models
- Fixed settings: Fast off, medium effort
- No third-party models, cloud agents or own API keys
- GitHub CopilotPro$10/moIndividuals; 1,500 AI credits ($15) a month, of which 500 are a flex allotment that may change
- Unlimited completions and next edit suggestions
- Cloud agent and pull request code review
- Most models; some premium models excluded
- JetBrains AIAI Pro$10/mo$100 a year billed yearly; 30-day trial, card needed
- 10 AI credits every 30 days
- Junie, Claude Agent, Codex and Gemini agents
- Top-up credits at API rates
Prices as listed on each pricing page, in USD per month, excluding tax. Observed: Cursor 2026-10-16, GitHub Copilot 2026-10-16, JetBrains AI 2026-10-16.
Which one fits
- If you need to start today without a sales call
- GitHub CopilotSelf-serve sign-up; the highest score of the 3 self-serve products here (8.3/10).
- Lowest starter price
- Cursor$8/mo for the Plus (individual) plan.
- Highest overall score
- GitHub Copilot8.3/10 (Excellent). The review shows the score breakdown and the run behind it.
Picked by fixed rules from the table above, not by hand. How we score
Full reviews
Add a product
Search by product name or by what it does, such as “email” or “feature flags”. 1 more fits in this comparison.