Managed Postgres · Comparison

Crunchy Bridge vs Supabase

2 products compared side by side: what you pay for with each one first, then the five access facts, entry prices, recorded plan limits and the bottom line of each review. The evidence note under the table says how each product was checked.

Side by side

Crunchy Bridge vs Supabase: value, access facts, plan limits and bottom lines
MetricCrunchy BridgeSupabase
What you're paying forSaves engineering timeManaged Postgres on AWS, Azure or Google Cloud at one price per cluster, with 10 days of point-in-time recovery and data transfer included.Saves engineering timeA Postgres database with auth, storage and APIs in one project for $25 a month, with daily backups and a choice of 17 AWS regions.
Overall score5.96.0Best
Free optionPaid onlyFree plan
Card to startCard required–Not measured
Getting accessSelf-serveSelf-serve
Starter priceCheapest paid plan$9/mo$25/mo
Pricing modelUsage-basedSeat + usage
Pricing pagePublic pricesPublic prices
Billing unitsCluster size per month (prorated), storage (GB)Plan fee, compute hours, disk (GB)
Free planNone; Hobby-0 from $9/mo plus storage500 MB per project, 2 projects; paused after 1 week inactive
10 GB app with staging, per month$22.17 on Hobby, computed$35.06 on Pro, computed
Point-in-time recoveryAny minute in the last 10 days, every plan$100/mo add-on per 7 days; needs Small compute
Automatic backups at no extra chargeDaily base backups plus WAL, kept 10 daysDaily, kept 7 days (Pro)
SOC 2 Type II reportOn request from Crunchy Data; no plan limit statedTeam plan ($599/mo)
HIPAA BAAOn request; no plan limit statedTeam plan, paid add-on
EU regionsFrankfurt, Ireland, Paris, Stockholm, Milan (AWS); also Azure and GCPIreland, Paris, Frankfurt, Stockholm
SAML SSO for the dashboardNot supported; Google, Microsoft or OpenID Connect SSOListed on Team; table says Contact Us
Branch with production dataYes, a fork from any point in the last 10 daysNeeds the PITR add-on
Bottom lineFrom its public pages, Crunchy Bridge includes 10 days of recovery on every plan and keeps the bill to a cluster price plus storage. Its lowest-priced plans are Hobby, which the docs say is not for production, and dashboard SSO is OpenID Connect rather than SAML.From its public pages, Supabase gives the most around the database: auth, storage and APIs with daily backups for $25. For a database alone, PITR as a flat add-on and per-hour branches make it the highest-priced of the three in our scenario.

Evidence: Crunchy Bridge: facts checked 2026-10-15 from its public sign-up and pricing pages, no completed hands-on run; Supabase: facts checked 2026-10-15 from its public sign-up and pricing pages, no completed hands-on run. Prices in USD as listed, excluding tax. "–" means not recorded.

Entry price

Baseline: each product's cheapest paid plan, per month. Included usage differs, so read the line under each price.

  • Crunchy BridgeLowest price
    Hobby-0
    $9/mo
    2 burstable vCPUs, 512 MB, AWS only; plus $0.10/GB storage
    • Not intended for production, per the docs
    • No PgBouncer, high availability or SLA
    • Up to 100 GB of storage
    • Backups and data transfer included
  • Supabase
    Pro
    $25/mo
    From $25; $10 compute credit (one Micro instance), 8 GB disk per project, then $0.125/GB
    • Daily backups kept 7 days
    • PITR add-on: $100/mo per 7 days
    • Branching: $0.01344 per branch-hour
    • Spend cap on by default
    • Email support

Prices as listed on each pricing page, in USD per month, excluding tax. Observed: Crunchy Bridge 2026-10-15, Supabase 2026-10-15.

Which one fits

If you need to start today without a sales call
SupabaseSelf-serve sign-up; the highest score of the 2 self-serve products here (6.0/10).
Lowest starter price
Crunchy Bridge$9/mo for the Hobby-0 plan.
Highest overall score
Supabase6.0/10 (Good). The review shows the score breakdown and the run behind it.

Picked by fixed rules from the table above, not by hand. How we score

Full reviews

More in Managed Postgres

Add a product

Search by product name or by what it does, such as “email” or “feature flags”. 2 more fit in this comparison.