Frontend and app hosting · Comparison
Heroku vs Netlify
2 products compared side by side: what you pay for with each one first, then the five access facts, entry prices, recorded plan limits and the bottom line of each review. The evidence note under the table says how each product was checked.
Side by side
| Metric | Heroku | Netlify |
|---|---|---|
| What you're paying for | Saves engineering timePush code and run it on managed dynos with no bandwidth or seat charges, from $7 a month for an always-on Basic dyno. | Saves engineering timeDeploys, previews, functions, forms and a database in one credit balance, with unlimited team members on Pro for $20 a month. |
| Overall score | 6.2 | 7.3Best |
| Free option | Paid only | Free plan |
| Card to start | –Not measured | –Not measured |
| Getting access | Self-serve | Self-serve |
| Starter priceCheapest paid plan | $5/mo | $9/mo |
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Tiered |
| Pricing page | Public prices | Public prices |
| Billing units | Dynos and add-ons, prorated to the second | Credits (bandwidth, requests, compute, deploys) |
| Free plan | None; Eco dynos $5/mo for personal apps | 300 credits/mo, commercial use allowed |
| 3 developers, 10M requests, 1 TB/mo | $7 on one Basic dyno, computed | $155 on Pro, computed |
| Data transfer | Not billed; 2 TB per app soft limit | 20 credits per GB (about $0.13 at the Pro pack rate) |
| Seats for people who deploy | Heroku Teams: no seat charge, up to 25 members | Unlimited members on Pro |
| SAML SSO | Heroku Teams, no extra charge | Enterprise |
| Spend cap | None stated | Stops at your credits unless auto recharge is on |
| SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 | Both (reports by request) | Both |
| HIPAA BAA | Shield Private Space (up to $3,000/mo), by ticket | Enterprise add-on |
| Runtime logs, entry paid plan | Last 1,500 lines, up to 1 week; drains to export | 7 days |
| Audit logs | Enterprise accounts only, not sold to new customers | Pro, 7-day history |
| Bottom line | From its public pages, Heroku covers our scenario for $7 and charges neither seats nor bandwidth. It scores lower on this rubric for having no free plan, no stored logs and no audit trail for new customers, and it is now in a sustaining engineering model. | From its public pages, Netlify suits teams with modest traffic: unlimited members on Pro, a free plan you may use commercially and spending that stops by default. Bandwidth is billed in credits, so data-heavy apps cost more here than on the other two. |
Evidence: Heroku: facts checked 2026-10-15 from its public sign-up and pricing pages, no completed hands-on run; Netlify: facts checked 2026-10-15 from its public sign-up and pricing pages, no completed hands-on run. Prices in USD as listed, excluding tax. "–" means not recorded.
Entry price
Baseline: each product's cheapest paid plan, per month. Included usage differs, so read the line under each price.
- HerokuLowest priceEco$5/mo1,000 dyno hours a month shared across Eco dynos; personal apps only
- Sleeps after 30 minutes of inactivity
- Not available to Heroku Teams
- NetlifyPersonal$9/mo1,000 credits/mo; 1 member; 500 more credits for $5
- Smart secret detection
- Priority email support
- 7-day function logs
Prices as listed on each pricing page, in USD per month, excluding tax. Observed: Heroku 2026-10-15, Netlify 2026-10-15.
Which one fits
- If you need to start today without a sales call
- NetlifySelf-serve sign-up; the highest score of the 2 self-serve products here (7.3/10).
- Lowest starter price
- Heroku$5/mo for the Eco dynos plan.
- Highest overall score
- Netlify7.3/10 (Good). The review shows the score breakdown and the run behind it.
Picked by fixed rules from the table above, not by hand. How we score
Full reviews
More in Frontend and app hosting
Add a product
Search by product name or by what it does, such as “email” or “feature flags”. 2 more fit in this comparison.